<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 1% Solution to Real Estate Investing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doughroller.net/real-estate-investing/the-1-solution-to-real-estate-investing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doughroller.net/real-estate-investing/the-1-solution-to-real-estate-investing/</link>
	<description>Money Management and Personal Finance &#124; The Dough Roller</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:44:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logan</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/real-estate-investing/the-1-solution-to-real-estate-investing/comment-page-1/#comment-38209</link>
		<dc:creator>Logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 01:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughroller.net/2007/05/28/the-1-solution-to-real-estate-investing/#comment-38209</guid>
		<description>How are you able to finance nearly 100% of the purchase price? The only way I know how to do that is with 10% - 12% hard money, which will sustain the property but not cashflow or allow principle reduction. With 2-5 year balloon dates it is not a feasible investment if an equity position can not be carved out for re-finance in the future. 

Please advise,

Thank You!

Logan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How are you able to finance nearly 100% of the purchase price? The only way I know how to do that is with 10% &#8211; 12% hard money, which will sustain the property but not cashflow or allow principle reduction. With 2-5 year balloon dates it is not a feasible investment if an equity position can not be carved out for re-finance in the future. </p>
<p>Please advise,</p>
<p>Thank You!</p>
<p>Logan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Carnival of Real Estate Investing at EquityScout.com &#171; Los Angeles Investment Realestate</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/real-estate-investing/the-1-solution-to-real-estate-investing/comment-page-1/#comment-30692</link>
		<dc:creator>The Carnival of Real Estate Investing at EquityScout.com &#171; Los Angeles Investment Realestate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 06:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughroller.net/2007/05/28/the-1-solution-to-real-estate-investing/#comment-30692</guid>
		<description>[...] out the trio, The Dough Roller presents The 1% Solution to Real Estate Investing posted at The Dough Roller, saying, The 1% rule is a rule-of-thumb that has fallen out of favor in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out the trio, The Dough Roller presents The 1% Solution to Real Estate Investing posted at The Dough Roller, saying, The 1% rule is a rule-of-thumb that has fallen out of favor in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Carnival of Real Estate Investing at EquityScout.com :: Real Estate Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/real-estate-investing/the-1-solution-to-real-estate-investing/comment-page-1/#comment-30536</link>
		<dc:creator>The Carnival of Real Estate Investing at EquityScout.com :: Real Estate Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughroller.net/2007/05/28/the-1-solution-to-real-estate-investing/#comment-30536</guid>
		<description>[...] out the trio, The Dough Roller presents The 1% Solution to Real Estate Investing posted at The Dough Roller, saying, The 1% rule is a rule-of-thumb that has fallen out of favor in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out the trio, The Dough Roller presents The 1% Solution to Real Estate Investing posted at The Dough Roller, saying, The 1% rule is a rule-of-thumb that has fallen out of favor in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DR</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/real-estate-investing/the-1-solution-to-real-estate-investing/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>DR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 10:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughroller.net/2007/05/28/the-1-solution-to-real-estate-investing/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Q, you make a good point.  I&#039;v found, generally speaking, that the better the neighborhood and nicer the home, the lower the cashflow.  On the upside, not only is the property generally less of a management headache, but appreciation is generally better.  That said, I&#039;m surprised that a 4-unit property doesn&#039;t generate combined rents equal to or greater than 1% of the cost of the property.  Multi-unit properties generally generate higher cashflows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q, you make a good point.  I&#8217;v found, generally speaking, that the better the neighborhood and nicer the home, the lower the cashflow.  On the upside, not only is the property generally less of a management headache, but appreciation is generally better.  That said, I&#8217;m surprised that a 4-unit property doesn&#8217;t generate combined rents equal to or greater than 1% of the cost of the property.  Multi-unit properties generally generate higher cashflows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q at $1 Million to My Name</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/real-estate-investing/the-1-solution-to-real-estate-investing/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Q at $1 Million to My Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 22:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughroller.net/2007/05/28/the-1-solution-to-real-estate-investing/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I would not use that as a property searching tool.  My 4-family doesn&#039;t meet the criteria.  It is true that if I had purchased in a seedier part of town, I could have bought an 8-family and set myself up for greater potential monthly cash flow.

But I bought this building as a long-term, low-headache investment.  It&#039;s in a great neighborhood - in fact, it&#039;s in my neighborhood, right across the alley from my house.  Houses in my neighborhood range from $200,000 up to $500,000, and I&#039;m in the Midwest.  So it&#039;s a very decent neighborhood.  I&#039;ll trade a little less cashflow for a beautiful solid building that will be a great long-term asset for my family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not use that as a property searching tool.  My 4-family doesn&#8217;t meet the criteria.  It is true that if I had purchased in a seedier part of town, I could have bought an 8-family and set myself up for greater potential monthly cash flow.</p>
<p>But I bought this building as a long-term, low-headache investment.  It&#8217;s in a great neighborhood &#8211; in fact, it&#8217;s in my neighborhood, right across the alley from my house.  Houses in my neighborhood range from $200,000 up to $500,000, and I&#8217;m in the Midwest.  So it&#8217;s a very decent neighborhood.  I&#8217;ll trade a little less cashflow for a beautiful solid building that will be a great long-term asset for my family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/15 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 374/379 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: DoughRoller.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.doughroller.net @ 2012-02-13 05:11:58 -->
