<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Covestor Bad for Investors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doughroller.net/investing/is-covestor-bad-for-investors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doughroller.net/investing/is-covestor-bad-for-investors/</link>
	<description>Money Management and Personal Finance &#124; The Dough Roller</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:10:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Airelon</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/investing/is-covestor-bad-for-investors/comment-page-1/#comment-6812</link>
		<dc:creator>Airelon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughroller.net/2007/06/19/is-covestor-bad-for-investors/#comment-6812</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Rikki, and I don&#8217;t believe that Covestor will be &#8216;bad&#8217; for investors.  I do understand the concern the blogger mentions.  But from my experience with Covestor &#8211; I truly do not believe it will be &#8216;bad&#8217; for investors.  However, I do believe it will be &#8216;interesting&#8217;.  </p>
<p>First of all, I agreed wholeheartedly with this statement:</p>
<p>&#8220;Ultimately no returns on Covestor are ever going to be as good as the best posted on fantasy sites such as socialpicks or CAPS &#8211; because, without real money, there is no dis-incentive for high risk ‘attention getting’ bets.&#8221;</p>
<p>Without real money on the line?  An opinion doesn&#8217;t mean jack-squat.  The name of the game is risk, and reward.  Covestor not  only shows the rewards people make, but the risk they&#8217;ve taken on.  That&#8217;s key.  Because everyone&#8217;s risk tolerance is completely different.</p>
<p>Something else I&#8217;m coming to find that agrees with Rikki&#8217;s statement?  I&#8217;m not really concerned with others spectacular returns.  I don&#8217;t like that style of trading or investing.  Look at Tim Sykes.  Tim has phenomenal results.  But that style of trading just isn&#8217;t for me.  The markets are, what they are, because we all approach the business differently, and look to make money in different ways; we&#8217;re comfortable with different methods.</p>
<p>Covestor simply allows you to find individuals who truly are &#8216;putting it on the line&#8217;, and may have a similar approach.</p>
<p>The free-flow of information is truly revolutionizing the markets however.  It will be very interesting to see how this all pans out in 10 years time.</p>
<p>In addition, the tools are fantastic.  On each and every blog post I now put up?  The &#8216;certified investor&#8217; widget is on my post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petro</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/investing/is-covestor-bad-for-investors/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Petro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 17:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughroller.net/2007/06/19/is-covestor-bad-for-investors/#comment-212</guid>
		<description>hi, hi, hi! Beautiful site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, hi, hi! Beautiful site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Covestor CEO Rikki Tahta Responds To The Dough Roller&#8217;s Question&#8211;Is Covestor Bad For Investors : The Dough Roller</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/investing/is-covestor-bad-for-investors/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Covestor CEO Rikki Tahta Responds To The Dough Roller&#8217;s Question&#8211;Is Covestor Bad For Investors : The Dough Roller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughroller.net/2007/06/19/is-covestor-bad-for-investors/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>[...] days ago I asked whether Covestor is bad for investors. In case you&#8217;re not familiar with Covestor, it is a new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] days ago I asked whether Covestor is bad for investors. In case you&#8217;re not familiar with Covestor, it is a new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rikki Tahta</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/investing/is-covestor-bad-for-investors/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Rikki Tahta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 23:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughroller.net/2007/06/19/is-covestor-bad-for-investors/#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Hi - I&#039;m Rikki Tahta the CEO of Covestor. This is a very good post because it does highlight a macro problem that Covestor sets out to address. That in the abscence of transparency, real money and multi-measurement - the attention will get sucked by the outliers

So what are we doing to address that:

1) add full transparency and let everyone see where the results come from, the risk as well as the retun - and how long they&#039;ve outperformed benchmarks

2) Multi-faceted rankings. Investment is not a single axis competition. I am interested in who performs well with low trading volumes, diversifed or tight portfolios, sectors or geographies - when we launch rankings we will have over 50 tables

3) It has to be real money. If someone can consistently make real returns with real money and has the risk profile I&#039;m comfortable with - then I certainly interested.

Ultimately no returns on Covestor are ever going to be as good as the best posted on fantasy sites such as socialpicks or CAPS - because, without real money, there is no dis-incentive for high risk &#039;attention getting&#039; bets.

I personally am a buy-and-hold investor and one of the reasons I founded this business with my partners is not because I wanted to find risky traders - but because I was appalled at the cost of private wealth managers and the lack of transparency and choice I had in choosing who to take allocation guidance from.

So give me some boring options please - for 75% of my money that will go for my retirement and my kid&#039;s education - I want boring sensible planning. I just don&#039;t want to pay 3% to have it managed by a brand name bank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; I&#8217;m Rikki Tahta the CEO of Covestor. This is a very good post because it does highlight a macro problem that Covestor sets out to address. That in the abscence of transparency, real money and multi-measurement &#8211; the attention will get sucked by the outliers</p>
<p>So what are we doing to address that:</p>
<p>1) add full transparency and let everyone see where the results come from, the risk as well as the retun &#8211; and how long they&#8217;ve outperformed benchmarks</p>
<p>2) Multi-faceted rankings. Investment is not a single axis competition. I am interested in who performs well with low trading volumes, diversifed or tight portfolios, sectors or geographies &#8211; when we launch rankings we will have over 50 tables</p>
<p>3) It has to be real money. If someone can consistently make real returns with real money and has the risk profile I&#8217;m comfortable with &#8211; then I certainly interested.</p>
<p>Ultimately no returns on Covestor are ever going to be as good as the best posted on fantasy sites such as socialpicks or CAPS &#8211; because, without real money, there is no dis-incentive for high risk &#8216;attention getting&#8217; bets.</p>
<p>I personally am a buy-and-hold investor and one of the reasons I founded this business with my partners is not because I wanted to find risky traders &#8211; but because I was appalled at the cost of private wealth managers and the lack of transparency and choice I had in choosing who to take allocation guidance from.</p>
<p>So give me some boring options please &#8211; for 75% of my money that will go for my retirement and my kid&#8217;s education &#8211; I want boring sensible planning. I just don&#8217;t want to pay 3% to have it managed by a brand name bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bonecrusher</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/investing/is-covestor-bad-for-investors/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>bonecrusher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughroller.net/2007/06/19/is-covestor-bad-for-investors/#comment-120</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m on Covestor.com and a long term investor myself.  My interest is in learning more about asset allocation and what others are doing to build low-cost well-diversified portfolios.  At least on Covestor, you know that one&#039;s opinions are based on their actions - there&#039;s far less opportunity for deceit than on message boards.  And as for chasing performance, that&#039;s a bad idea no matter where you get the inspiration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on Covestor.com and a long term investor myself.  My interest is in learning more about asset allocation and what others are doing to build low-cost well-diversified portfolios.  At least on Covestor, you know that one&#8217;s opinions are based on their actions &#8211; there&#8217;s far less opportunity for deceit than on message boards.  And as for chasing performance, that&#8217;s a bad idea no matter where you get the inspiration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChristianPF</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/investing/is-covestor-bad-for-investors/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>ChristianPF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doughroller.net/2007/06/19/is-covestor-bad-for-investors/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>You are right. Investing should be boring. Buffett doesn&#039;t stand out very often on his one year returns, but boy did look like a genius when the dot-coms came crashing down a few years back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right. Investing should be boring. Buffett doesn&#8217;t stand out very often on his one year returns, but boy did look like a genius when the dot-coms came crashing down a few years back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
