<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How is the Dow Calculated?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doughroller.net/investing/dow-jones-index-calculated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doughroller.net/investing/dow-jones-index-calculated/</link>
	<description>Money Management and Personal Finance &#124; The Dough Roller</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:24:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gfred</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/investing/dow-jones-index-calculated/comment-page-1/#comment-13065</link>
		<dc:creator>gfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doughroller.net/?p=4939#comment-13065</guid>
		<description>Great post - can&#039;t wait to read your next one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post &#8211; can&#8217;t wait to read your next one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finance Nerd</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/investing/dow-jones-index-calculated/comment-page-1/#comment-13064</link>
		<dc:creator>Finance Nerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doughroller.net/?p=4939#comment-13064</guid>
		<description>Just to clarify one statement, the DJIA divisor is NOT adjusted for &quot;normal&quot; dividends, but it is adjusted for special (i.e. large) dividends.

Source: http://www.djaverages.com/?view=question&amp;page=faq#a6

A 2000 Stanford University study showed that the DOW would have been at 250,000 if dividend reinvestment had been included in the index.  Of course the Dow is down since then, but the value with dividend reinvestment would still be well over 100,000.

Source: http://www-siepr.stanford.edu/papers/pdf/99-16.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarify one statement, the DJIA divisor is NOT adjusted for &#8220;normal&#8221; dividends, but it is adjusted for special (i.e. large) dividends.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.djaverages.com/?view=question&#038;page=faq#a6" rel="nofollow">http://www.djaverages.com/?view=question&#038;page=faq#a6</a></p>
<p>A 2000 Stanford University study showed that the DOW would have been at 250,000 if dividend reinvestment had been included in the index.  Of course the Dow is down since then, but the value with dividend reinvestment would still be well over 100,000.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www-siepr.stanford.edu/papers/pdf/99-16.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www-siepr.stanford.edu/papers/pdf/99-16.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manshu</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/investing/dow-jones-index-calculated/comment-page-1/#comment-13060</link>
		<dc:creator>Manshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doughroller.net/?p=4939#comment-13060</guid>
		<description>Thanks to DR for letting me guest post here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to DR for letting me guest post here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 337/345 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: DoughRoller.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.doughroller.net @ 2012-02-12 22:03:49 -->
