<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Avoid a Mutual Fund&#8217;s Minimum Investment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doughroller.net/investing/avoid-mutual-fund-minimum-investment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doughroller.net/investing/avoid-mutual-fund-minimum-investment/</link>
	<description>Money Management and Personal Finance &#124; The Dough Roller</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:24:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DR</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/investing/avoid-mutual-fund-minimum-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-16272</link>
		<dc:creator>DR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doughroller.net/?p=4431#comment-16272</guid>
		<description>Moss, the point is that mutual funds and exchange traded funds ARE different.  Agreed that you pay a cost to buy and sell ETFs that you won&#039;t pay with no load funds.  But if you are a long term investor, the ETFs can be better in the long run because of the reduced expense ratio as compared to comparable mutual funds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moss, the point is that mutual funds and exchange traded funds ARE different.  Agreed that you pay a cost to buy and sell ETFs that you won&#8217;t pay with no load funds.  But if you are a long term investor, the ETFs can be better in the long run because of the reduced expense ratio as compared to comparable mutual funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moss</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/investing/avoid-mutual-fund-minimum-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-16267</link>
		<dc:creator>Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doughroller.net/?p=4431#comment-16267</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure it goes without saying, but... you do know that you are suggesting exchange traded funds are the same as a mutual fund. They are not. It also seems that -- even with a low commission from a discount broker online -- the total expense to use this method of accumulation rules out a prudent choice.

Don&#039;t get me wrong - I understand the need for higher minimums. But grabbing $100 worth of an index tracking ETF 30 times will cost &gt; 150 bones. $150 / $3000 (the Vanguard minimum) totals a cost to buy expressed as... ... 5 percent!

People need to realize that there are two costs involved:

1) Cost to buy
2) Cost to own

I think Mr. Krantz overlooks (or at least doesn&#039;t account for) this.

Now, I espouse the use of ETF&#039;s, mutual funds and individual securities, and the economies of scale apply, yet we cannot be penny wise and pound foolish.

Accumulate the minimum in an interest bearing savings account and pass on the coffee. In the end, the interest earned will (may?) treat a couple to a fine evening out. At least the commission savings will, and THAT is not a bad investment.


Moss
NASD Series 7 and 24
SEC Series 65</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure it goes without saying, but&#8230; you do know that you are suggesting exchange traded funds are the same as a mutual fund. They are not. It also seems that &#8212; even with a low commission from a discount broker online &#8212; the total expense to use this method of accumulation rules out a prudent choice.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; I understand the need for higher minimums. But grabbing $100 worth of an index tracking ETF 30 times will cost &gt; 150 bones. $150 / $3000 (the Vanguard minimum) totals a cost to buy expressed as&#8230; &#8230; 5 percent!</p>
<p>People need to realize that there are two costs involved:</p>
<p>1) Cost to buy<br />
2) Cost to own</p>
<p>I think Mr. Krantz overlooks (or at least doesn&#8217;t account for) this.</p>
<p>Now, I espouse the use of ETF&#8217;s, mutual funds and individual securities, and the economies of scale apply, yet we cannot be penny wise and pound foolish.</p>
<p>Accumulate the minimum in an interest bearing savings account and pass on the coffee. In the end, the interest earned will (may?) treat a couple to a fine evening out. At least the commission savings will, and THAT is not a bad investment.</p>
<p>Moss<br />
NASD Series 7 and 24<br />
SEC Series 65</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/investing/avoid-mutual-fund-minimum-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-13507</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doughroller.net/?p=4431#comment-13507</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing such great post, it will help many investors to get info about mutual fund investment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing such great post, it will help many investors to get info about mutual fund investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manshu</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/investing/avoid-mutual-fund-minimum-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-12796</link>
		<dc:creator>Manshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doughroller.net/?p=4431#comment-12796</guid>
		<description>Thanks for linking back to the OneMint carnival :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for linking back to the OneMint carnival <img src='http://DoughRoller.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Half Assed Housewife</title>
		<link>http://www.doughroller.net/investing/avoid-mutual-fund-minimum-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-12596</link>
		<dc:creator>Half Assed Housewife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 01:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doughroller.net/?p=4431#comment-12596</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for showing people a way around the required minimums. It is so disheartening when you want to invest, but don&#039;t feel as though you are rich enough to do so. Even billionaires have to start somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for showing people a way around the required minimums. It is so disheartening when you want to invest, but don&#8217;t feel as though you are rich enough to do so. Even billionaires have to start somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/15 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 379/381 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: DoughRoller.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.doughroller.net @ 2012-02-13 00:08:04 -->
